*Based on remarks made by Brett Robinson in the Rugby Unity podcast.
Brett Robinson, a prominent figure within World Rugby, has strongly advocated for structural modifications to the organization`s governance. Speaking on the Rugby Unity podcast, Robinson described the current framework as sluggish and ineffective for modern rugby.
Call for Systemic Change
Robinson highlighted the outdated nature of the processes governing the sport, noting that the system has remained largely unchanged for three decades. He stressed the necessity of revising operational methods, especially regarding rule changes.
“The system upon which World Rugby is built has been in place for 30 years. We need to look at how we operate differently. To change any rule, we require 75% of the vote.”
He provided a striking example of the bureaucracy involved, recalling a recent trial focused on modifying the ruck rules.
“Last November, we ran a trial period where we considered the possibility of ‘stopping’ in the ruck, and it was put to a vote. It lost by just one vote, and then it turned out someone pressed the wrong button. Consequently, we have systems that simply don’t work and prevent us from reacting with the necessary speed.”
Frustration Over Rule Implementation
Robinson also expressed significant frustration regarding the delay in adopting the 20-minute red card rule, suggesting that the protracted process was unnecessary and damaging to the sport’s agility.
“The implementation of the 20-minute red card was truly frustrating because it took us much longer [than necessary]. Some of our friends in the Northern Hemisphere needed to understand the matter better.”
Robinson’s comments underscore a demand for a streamlined and responsive decision-making structure that can adapt quickly to the evolving needs of global rugby.
